BLOCK B
- Easy to use and clear to read navigation bar
- Colour palette is nice to look at
- Difficult to understand how to access the articles (add an indicator button)
- Few grammar mistakes in article
- Decent quality of article content (may be missing a few details / quality for each article is inconsistent)
- Layout can be improved upon (a bit plain, however each article has a different layout)
- Certain texts are too small to read
- Font changes too inconsistently
- Text spacing is cramped
​
Overview:
-
Well thought out
-
Organized
-
Balanced
-
Nice overview of what the English page has to offer
-
Interactive
-
Clear visual of how English literature is taught
Presentation:
What is Done well:
-
Visuals relate to the subject and article
-
Neat and consistent
-
More realistic information
-
Content is meaningful
Needs Improvement
-
Adding more images
-
Provide article link buttons / without having users go ack to the home page
-
Add keywords so most important info stand out
-
Make images more relevant to content
​
- Some buttons are linked incorrectly​
- Articles have worse layout than past articles
- Articles contain generally a lot of the same content (although some variation is present)
- Layout could use more colour and icons
- Few missing punctuations
- Image quality on some images are poor
- English home page may be confusing to understand at first
- Articles don't contain enough pictures / spacing / contains too many words
- Layout has been improved (more variety) however, is still quite plain / articles are all in landscape format
- Some articles are linked wrong
- Home page buttons under each article are hard to find / some are linked incorrectly
​
What is Done Well:
- Colours do not require improvement
- Size and spacing is good
- Title and fonts are clear
- Talks about what the article promises
- Explanations are detailed and clear
​
Needs Improvement:
- Icons generally don't support, or are related to the texts given
- Quality of some images are poor
- Add information on why the subject is important
- images are clear
- layout and text layout is good and spacing
- tone is formal and content is related to the article
- title is clear
- article has intro
- conclusion is good
- 4/5
